“Open” means “Open Source”!

If you claim to be “Open” in your company name, your product should be “open source”. It’s in the name. Otherwise, it’s misleading, and this getting to the point of diabolical. It’s almost like these jokers are making a concerted effort to render the “open” in any open project meaningless.

To establish that there IS actually a naming convention for open source projects. Here is a short list of projects that use the naming convention correctly, linked to their source code.

Networking and Security

Programming and Development Tools

Graphics, Vision, and Multimedia

Scientific Computing and Engineering

Cloud and Infrastructure

Gaming and Simulation

Office and Productivity

Mapping and Data

Operating Systems and Distributions


… are all open source LONG before OpenAI bastardized the naming convention.

OpenAI started with intentions of being an open source company. Elon Musk has been very public about his early support and investments in the company being under the premise of their OPEN nature. But, they double backed, and went full evil and close sourced their models, but kept the OpenAI name.

Well, apparently that is now standard for any AI company.


OpenAI, is NOT open source!
OpenRouter, is NOT open source!
...and this just in…
OpenCreator is NOT open source.

It just so happens that I was thinking about building a node based UI for AI image and video generation. And, this morning I stumbled across this post on X…

Well what do you know a UI based AI Image/Video generator? Let’s keep these retards honest and create a clone of their product and MAKE IT OPEN SOURCE.

Feel free to follow along: https://github.com/snovak/opencreator

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *